From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 2008
2008 Ohio 6251 (Ohio 2008)

Summary

In Palmer, the District Court held that the petitioner had fairly presented allied offenses as a federal constitutional issue because he cited Ohio case law that employed federal constitutional analysis.

Summary of this case from Gaines v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

Opinion

No. 2008-0232.

Submitted November 19, 2008.

Decided December 9, 2008.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-060754, 2007-Ohio-6870.

Herbert J. Haas, for appellant.


{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, on the authority of State v. Brown, 119 Ohio St.3d 447, 2008-Ohio-4569, 895 N.E.2d 149, as to the court of appeals' holding on appellant's fifth assignment of error below to the extent that the two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide in violation of former R.C. 2903.06(A)(1)(a) and (A)(2)(a) were held to not be allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.25(A). The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Brown.

MOYER, C.J., AND PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 2008
2008 Ohio 6251 (Ohio 2008)

In Palmer, the District Court held that the petitioner had fairly presented allied offenses as a federal constitutional issue because he cited Ohio case law that employed federal constitutional analysis.

Summary of this case from Gaines v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Case details for

State v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PALMER, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 9, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 6251 (Ohio 2008)
2008 Ohio 6251
898 N.E.2d 960

Citing Cases

Gaines v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution

involved a single automobile accident resulting in the death of one victim, Ohio Rev. Code § 2941.25 could be…

State v. Johnson

{¶ 24} A court should declare a mistrial “only when the ends of justice so require and when a fair trial [i]s…