State v. Palinkas

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Wimberly

    588 So. 2d 1343 (La. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 5 times
    In Wimberly, the police had received information from a reliable confidential informant who had seen the defendant with a large quantity of cocaine in his apartment, and who said that the defendant would leave his apartment in one of three described cars after 10:00 a.m. to go to the Cedar Grove area of Shreveport to sell cocaine.

    However, as recently stated by the court, a defendant cannot be both represented and representative, that is, he cannot have counsel, and also act as his own counsel. State v. Gene, 587 So.2d 18 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991); State v. Palinkas, 587 So.2d 27 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991). Therefore, defendant's assignments of error are not considered.