From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Palacios

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 26, 2023
No. 2023-UP-163 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-163 Appellate Case 2021-000620

04-26-2023

The State, Respondent, v. Walter Alexander Palacios, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Walter A. Palacios, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2023

Appeal From Colleton County DeAndrea G. Benjamin, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Walter A. Palacios, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and VERDIN, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Palacios

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 26, 2023
No. 2023-UP-163 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2023)
Case details for

State v. Palacios

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Walter Alexander Palacios, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 26, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-163 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2023)