From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pacheco

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Apr 10, 2014
133 Hawaii 451 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

stating that evidence offered under Rule 404 must still be reviewed with respect to HRE Rule 403

Summary of this case from State v. Bringas

Opinion

No. CAAP–12–0000960.

2014-04-10

STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Joseph K. PACHECO, III, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Circuit (CASE NO. 3P612–119). Dean T. Kaukam, on the briefs, for Defendant–Appellant. Linda L. Walton, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, on the briefs, for Plaintiff–Appellee.



Summaries of

State v. Pacheco

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Apr 10, 2014
133 Hawaii 451 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)

stating that evidence offered under Rule 404 must still be reviewed with respect to HRE Rule 403

Summary of this case from State v. Bringas
Case details for

State v. Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Joseph K. PACHECO, III…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

133 Hawaii 451 (Haw. Ct. App. 2014)
330 P.3d 389

Citing Cases

State v. Bringas

Furthermore, even if evidence is admissible under HRE Rules 401, 402, 404(a) and/or Rule 404(b), it remains…