From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 17, 1969
54 N.J. 579 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued November 5, 1969 —

Decided November 17, 1969.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 106 N.J. Super. 173.

Mrs. Miriam N. Span, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Ruston H. Ridgway, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Joseph Tuso, Cumberland County Prosecutor, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 106 N.J. Super. 540.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 17, 1969
54 N.J. 579 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICTOR PACHECO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 17, 1969

Citations

54 N.J. 579 (N.J. 1969)
258 A.2d 368

Citing Cases

State v. Spivey

Before leaving the subject, I think it is important to reiterate for the benefit of trial judges that the…

State v. Pugh

United States v. Sullivan, 406 F.2d 180, 185-186 (2 Cir. 1969); Arizona v. McClendon, 103 Ariz. 105, 437 P.2d…