From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Owen

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1993
855 P.2d 1141 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

91-1390; CA A75137

Submitted on record and briefs June 2, 1993

Affirmed July 14, 1993 Reconsideration denied September 29, 1993 Petition for review denied November 30, 1993 ( 318 Or. 98)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clatsop County.

Thomas E. Edison, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). State v. Adams, 315 Or. 359, 847 P.2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or. App. 462, 852 P.2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or. App. 165, 851 P.2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Owen

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 30, 1993
855 P.2d 1141 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Owen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID NICHOLS OWEN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 30, 1993

Citations

855 P.2d 1141 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
855 P.2d 1141