From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Overholser

Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 17, 2016
62 N.E.3d 178 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

No. 2015–0956.

05-17-2016

The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. OVERHOLSER, Appellee.

D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ryan A. Saunders, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Richard E. Mayhall, Springfield, for appellee.


D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ryan A. Saunders, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Richard E. Mayhall, Springfield, for appellee.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

LANZINGER and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.


Summaries of

State v. Overholser

Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 17, 2016
62 N.E.3d 178 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

State v. Overholser

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellant, v. OVERHOLSER, Appellee.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: May 17, 2016

Citations

62 N.E.3d 178 (Ohio 2016)
147 Ohio St. 3d 165
2016 Ohio 2969

Citing Cases

T. P. Ry. Co. v. Johnson

" The opinion in the case of The State v. Overholser, 69 Ind. 144, is to the same effect. In the case under…