On October 22, 1998, the Connecticut Supreme Court denied certification. See State v. Otto, 719 A.2d 1171 (Conn. 1998). On December 11, 1998, the petitioner commenced this federal habeas action.
State v. Cotton, supra, 77 Conn. App. 765. In this instance, we conclude that the two offenses constitute the "same offense" under a Blockburger analysis because only one of the offenses requires proof of an additional fact that the other does not.State v. Otto, 50 Conn. App. 1, 19, 717 A.2d 775, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 927, 719 A.2d 1171 (1998). "Our analysis of double jeopardy claims does not end, however, with a comparison of the offenses.
(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Otto, 50 Conn.App. 1, 11, 717 A.2d 775, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 927, 719 A.2d 1171 (1998). When a defendant is charged with the commission of a crime for which the state must prove recklessness, evidence of mental impairment is relevant.