Opinion
ID No. 0602006591.
March 6, 2007.
Upon Petitioner's Motion for Postconviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 61. DENIED.
ORDER
1. On December 5, 2006, Petitioner filed a document entitled "Motion for Postconviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 61." The motion is actually a motion for modification or correction of sentence.
2. Petitioner argues that the Level 5 sentence in Case No. 0308001824 should run concurrently with the Level 4 probationary sentence in Case No. 0602006591.
3. Level 5 cannot run concurrently with any other sentence. Therefore, the Level 4 time is consecutive to the Level 5 time. THEREFORE, Petitioner's Motion for Modification or Correction of Sentence, improperly captioned "Motion for Postconviction Relief Pursuant to Rule 61," is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2007.