From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. One Five-Passenger Ford

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 13, 1927
111 So. 10 (Ala. 1927)

Opinion

6 Div. 758.

January 13, 1927.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; W. M. Walker, Judge.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robt. G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

The decree is erroneous, in that the Prohibition Act imposes no extra duties upon the register. Acts 1919, p. 13; Code 1923, § 4778. Any fees of the register for services rendered in chancery causes are to be paid into the county treasury. Local Acts 1915, p. 374; Armstrong v. Jefferson County, 208 Ala. 645, 95 So. 39. The register may not serve in two capacities. Constitution 1901, § 281; Code 1923, § 2575.

Clarence Mullins, of Birmingham, for appellee.

The court had the right to appoint appellee as custodian and to fix his compensation for the extra services imposed. Code 1923, §§ 4779, 4782, 4284; Magee v. Cowperthwaite, 10 Ala. 966.


By the decree in this case Hunter Armstrong, Esq., was allowed compensation for his services rendered as custodian of one Ford automobile, after its seizure by officers of the law because it had been used in the unlawful transportation of spirituous liquors, and pending the decree directing its sale. Armstrong was and is register of the court passing the decree, and doubtless that fact suggested his appointment as custodian; but his appointment was in no way dependent upon that fact. It was within the authority of the court to appoint any one else. It results, in our judgment, that the compensation awarded to Armstrong, who is the real appellee in this case, had no necessary connection with the fact that he was register for the court, and is unaffected by legislation fixing the salary of the register in chancery for Jefferson county, or by the decision in Armstrong v. Jefferson County, 208 Ala. 645, 95 So. 39, or Waldrop v. Henry, 207 Ala. 128, 92 So. 425. Armstrong was in every essential particular a receiver appointed by the court, and the power of the court to award him compensation for his services in that relation is not doubted. Magee v. Cowperthwaite, 10 Ala. 966.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. One Five-Passenger Ford

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 13, 1927
111 So. 10 (Ala. 1927)
Case details for

State v. One Five-Passenger Ford

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. ONE FIVE-PASSENGER FORD, LICENSE NO. 14837

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jan 13, 1927

Citations

111 So. 10 (Ala. 1927)
111 So. 10