From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Olson

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jun 11, 2015
865 N.W.2d 124 (N.D. 2015)

Opinion

No. 20150034.

06-11-2015

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jeffrey Alan OLSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jeffrey Alan Olson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of forgery under N.D.C.C. § 12 .1–24–01. Olson argues the State failed to present sufficient evidence the checks were forged or counterfeited under the definition provided to the jury and the district court erred by refusing to grant Olson's Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., motion for acquittal. We conclude sufficient evidence exists the checks were forged or counterfeited and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Olson

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jun 11, 2015
865 N.W.2d 124 (N.D. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Olson

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jeffrey Alan OLSON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

865 N.W.2d 124 (N.D. 2015)