State v. Odom

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Anthony Odom, Petitioner.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 22, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2018-001676 (S.C. Jan. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-001676 Memorandum Opinion No. 2020-MO-001

01-22-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Anthony Odom, Petitioner.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard III, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Edgefield County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard III, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Odom, Op. No. 2018-UP-273 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 27, 2018). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.