From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ochoa

North Carolina Court of Appeals
May 1, 2005
170 N.C. App. 198 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. COA04-939

Filed 3 May 2005 This case not for publication

Appeal by surety from judgment entered 16 March 2004 by Judge Michael A. Sabiston in Randolph County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 March 2005.

GAVIN, COX, PUGH WILHOIT, LLP, by Robert E. Wilhoit and Alan V. Pugh, for the State. ANDRESEN VANN, by Kenneth P. Andresen and Christopher M. Vann, for the surety. No brief filed for defendant.


Randolph County No. 03 CR 050140.


Surety Aegis Security Insurance Co. posted a $500,000 bond for defendant Reynaldo Ochoa to guarantee his 11 February 2003 court appearance on felony drug charges. Following defendant's failure to appear on his assigned court date, the trial court entered a bond forfeiture judgment against surety. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-544.8(b)(1), surety filed a motion to vacate the bond forfeiture judgment. The trial court denied surety's motion. Surety appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutionality of the bond forfeiture statute. For the reasons stated in State v. Ferrer Aegis Security Insurance Co. (COA04-935, filed contemporaneously), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Judges CALABRIA and GEER concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).


Summaries of

State v. Ochoa

North Carolina Court of Appeals
May 1, 2005
170 N.C. App. 198 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Ochoa

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. REYNALDO H. OCHOA, Defendant, and AEGIS…

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: May 1, 2005

Citations

170 N.C. App. 198 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005)