Opinion
No. 30675
Decided May 29, 1946.
Supreme Court — Dismissal, sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Improper exposure of person in presence of female child — Section 12423-1, General Code (109 Ohio Laws, 45) — Sufficiency of indictment not charging assault without intent to rape — "In the presence of" sufficiently informative as to position of parties, when — Testimony by accused as to life history — Cross-examination eliciting suspicion of former similar conduct, improper, when — Claimed misconduct of trial judge and prosecuting attorney — Fair and impartial trial.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.
Mr. Joel S. Rhinefort, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Jerome Jesionowski, for appellee.
Mr. Charles J. McLaughlin, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, TURNER, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.