From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nixon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 21, 2005
164 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 60834-01.

March 29, 2005. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 16, 2005. Application for Transfer Denied June 21, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the County of Jefferson; Timothy J. Patterson, Judge.

Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.


ORDER


Johnnie Ray Nixon's ("Movant") judgment and sentence and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief were affirmed in a consolidated appeal styled State v. Nixon, 858 S.W.2d 782 (Mo.App. 1993). He filed a motion to recall the mandate and we granted the motion "to address the merits of [Movant's] claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel." We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined Movant's claim to be without merit. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their use only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment, sentence and denial of post-conviction relief are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Nixon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 21, 2005
164 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Nixon

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Johnnie Ray NIXON, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 21, 2005

Citations

164 S.W.3d 62 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)