From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Niswender

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 29, 1986
719 P.2d 517 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

23-272; CA A35082

Argued and submitted December 30, 1985.

Reversed and remanded for new trial May 29, 1986.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tillamook County, Bert Gustafson, Judge Pro Tempore.

Timothy M. Dolan, Garibaldi, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Thomas E. Sweeney, Garibaldi.

Terry Ann Leggert, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Defendant appeals his conviction for borrowing a game tag, ORS 497.400(2), contending that the trial court erred in denying a motion for continuance, which would have allowed the parties to secure the presence of a witness for trial. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying defendant's request for continuance in which the state joined. Because defendant met the requirements for obtaining a continuance for the purpose of securing a witness for trial, see State v. Otten, 234 Or. 219, 223, 380 P.2d 812 (1963); State v. Birchard, 23 Or. App. 17, 21-22, 540 P.2d 1033 (1975), we agree that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny a continuance. State v. Wolfer, 241 Or. 15, 403 P.2d 715 (1965); State v. Schroeder, 62 Or. App. 331, 339, 661 P.2d 111, rev den 295 Or. 161 (1983).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Niswender

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 29, 1986
719 P.2d 517 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Niswender

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THOMAS A. NISWENDER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 29, 1986

Citations

719 P.2d 517 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
719 P.2d 517

Citing Cases

In re Gustafson

The denial in Niswender led the Court of Appeals to reverse the conviction for abuse of discretion. State v.…