We have also examined the contents of the application and find them sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant. State v. Crisp, 307 So.2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); State v. Niles, 307 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Sections 933.04 and 933.07, Florida Statutes (1975).
Reliability may be established by a recital of facts showing why the affiant considers the informant reliable. See State v. Middleton, 302 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1 DCA 1974), and State v. Niles, 307 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4 DCA 1975). Reliability may be established by detailed information contained in the affidavit. See Reed v. State, 267 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1972).
PER CURIAM. The order granting defendant's Motion to Suppress is reversed upon authority of State v. Crisp, 307 So.2d 454 (4th D.C.A. Fla. 1975); State v. Niles, 307 So.2d 455, 4th D.C.A. Opinion issued February 7, 1975 and State v. Wolff, 310 So.2d 729, Supreme Court Opinion issued February 26, 1975. Reversed.