From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Niko

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 31, 2005
201 Or. App. 395 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

02750; A123250.

Submitted on record and briefs July 28, 2005.

August 31, 2005.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Baker County. Gregory L. Baxter, Judge.

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Eric Johansen, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Solicitor General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.

Schuman, J., vice Richardson, S.J.


PER CURIAM

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was convicted of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. The trial court imposed an upward durational departure sentence based on findings that the victim was especially vulnerable and that defendant had violated a position of trust. On appeal, defendant challenges only the sentence, arguing that, under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), the court erred in imposing a departure sentence based on facts that defendant did not admit and that the court did not submit to a jury. He concedes that he did not advance such a challenge to the trial court, but argues that the sentence should be reviewed as plain error. The state concedes that, under our decisions in State v. Gornick, 196 Or App 397, 102 P3d 734 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 583 (2005), and State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005), the sentence is plainly erroneous. We accept the state's concession and, for the reasons discussed in those cases, exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Niko

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 31, 2005
201 Or. App. 395 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Niko

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALFRED NIKO III, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 31, 2005

Citations

201 Or. App. 395 (Or. Ct. App. 2005)
118 P.3d 851

Citing Cases

State v. Niko

HASELTON, J. This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, which vacated our prior…

STATE v. NIKO

October 3, 2008. Appeal from the ( 201 Or App 395). Petitions for Review…