Opinion
24-K-599
12-16-2024
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CHRISTOPHER V. NICOLAIS IN RE CHRISTOPHER V. NICOLAIS
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE JUNE B. DARENSBURG, DIVISION "C", NUMBER 23-1545, 23-2968, 24-1064
Panel composed of Stephen J. Windhorst, John J. Molaison, Jr., and Timothy S. Marcel, Judges.
WRIT DENIED
The relator, Christopher Nicolais, filed the instant pleading which is styled as the "re-urging" of his prior writ application, 24-K-295, that sought various forms of mandamus relief. We denied that application, and the Louisiana Supreme Court also denied writs. State v. Nicolais, 24-295 (La.App. 5. Cir. 07/15/25) (unpublished disposition), writ denied, State v. Nicolais, 24-999 (La. 10/15/24), 394 So.3d 822. Reconsideration of a writ application that has been denied is not permitted under Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-18.7. In addition, any motion for reconsideration of 24-K-295, even if permissible, is untimely in this case under Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-18.2.
With regard to any other allegations raised in the instant application, we note that the relator provides no ruling or record for our review, and no evidence that any of his claims have first been filed at the district court, as required by Uniform Rules - Courts of Appeal, Rule 1-3.
For these reasons, and on the showing made, the relator's writ application is denied. Gretna, Louisiana, this 16th day of December, 2024.
JJM
SJW
TSM