From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nickell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
540 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80023

03-06-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Gene NICKELL, Appellant.

Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Christian E. Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, for appellant.


Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Christian E. Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Ronald Nickell ("Nickell") appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted enticement of a child, section 566.151, following a jury trial in the circuit court of Adair County, Missouri. Nickell raised only one point on appeal that the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the admission of the transcripts of his online conversations because the transcripts violated the best evidence rule. Specifically, Nickell contends that the transcripts admitted into evidence were copied from Facebook messages without the emojis and thus were not an exact or true reflection of the conversation. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Nickell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
540 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Nickell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Gene NICKELL, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

540 S.W.3d 863 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)