State v. Newell

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Nicholas Shane Newell, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

2012-UP-345 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-345

06-06-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Nicholas Shane Newell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr. and J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted May 1, 2012

Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr. and J. Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Nicholas Shane Newell appeals his probation revocation, arguing his due process rights were violated as the arrest warrant does not indicate that he was provided a preliminary hearing upon his arrest. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.