From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Newcome

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 5, 1986
501 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-1543

Decided December 5, 1986.

Appellate procedure — Dismissal of appeal because appellant's brief was at least thirteen days late after single extension of time — App. R. 18(A) — Court abuses its discretion, when.

APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Crawford County.

Stanley E. Flegm, prosecuting attorney, and Russell B. Wiseman, for appellee.

Stephen E. Maher and Steven A. Larson, for appellant.


This cause, on appeal from the court of appeals (case Nos. 3-86-8 and -9), is reversed on authority of Hawkins v. Marion Correctional Institute (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 4, decided this date.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Newcome

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 5, 1986
501 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 1986)
Case details for

State v. Newcome

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NEWCOME, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 5, 1986

Citations

501 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 1986)
501 N.E.2d 1197

Citing Cases

Norton v. Galion

E. Richard Hottenroth, for appellees Paulette Ritchey Boehm and Kenneth E. Durtsche, in their individual…

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm

We disagree. Where, as here, there has been no showing of a lack of diligence, disregard for court…