From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Newbill

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 28, 2020
598 S.W.3d 703 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82520

04-28-2020

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dante NEWBILL, Appellant.

Rosemary E. Percival, Kansas City for appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City for respondent.


Rosemary E. Percival, Kansas City for appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam Dante Newbill appeals from his conviction and sentence for second-degree assault. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Newbill

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 28, 2020
598 S.W.3d 703 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Newbill

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dante NEWBILL, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Apr 28, 2020

Citations

598 S.W.3d 703 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)