From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Neal

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 22, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-000465 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000465 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-207

04-22-2015

The State, Respondent, v. William Russell Neal, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Newberry County
Eugene C. Griffith, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.


Summaries of

State v. Neal

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 22, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-000465 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. William Russell Neal, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 22, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-000465 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2015)