From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Neal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 17, 1996
936 S.W.2d 235 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 66057, 69736

OPINION FILED: December 17, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY HON. LUCY DECKER RAUCH.

John M. Schilmoeller, Office of State Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before: Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J. and Gaertner, J.



ORDER


Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of trafficking drugs in the second degree, § 195.223, RSMo Supp. 1993. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury's assessment to a prison term of seven years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant does not address any points in his appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Neal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 17, 1996
936 S.W.2d 235 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, vs. DANNY NEAL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 17, 1996

Citations

936 S.W.2d 235 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)