From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Naylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Apr 24, 2013
300 P.3d 307 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

10C40413 A149293.

2013-04-24

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Charles Evans NAYLOR, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County. Albin W. Norblad, Judge. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jonah Morningstar, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.
Albin W. Norblad, Judge.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jonah Morningstar, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of second-degree theft. ORS 164.045. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal and in imposing $87.33 of restitution, a $67 unitary assessment, a $35 surcharge, and $390 in attorney fees. We reject without published discussion all of defendant's contentions except for his argument that the trial court erred in imposing attorney fees. With respect to that assertion, the state concedes that “the trial court erred by imposing $390 in attorney's fees in the judgment when the record does not support defendant's ability to pay those fees.” We agree and accept the state's concession. See State v. Pendergrapht, 251 Or.App. 630, 284 P.3d 573 (2012) (holding that it is error to impose attorney fees where the record does not support the defendant's ability to pay those fees).

Attorney fee assessment reversed; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Naylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Apr 24, 2013
300 P.3d 307 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Naylor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Charles Evans NAYLOR…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Apr 24, 2013

Citations

300 P.3d 307 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
300 P.3d 307