Opinion
891 CA 22-01166
11-17-2023
In the Matter of STATE of New York, Petitioner-Respondent, v. NATHAN E., Respondent-Appellant.
LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MAURICE J. VERRILLO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MAURICE J. VERRILLO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, OGDEN, AND NOWAK, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.