State v. Nash

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Tate

    No. E2021-00217-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 28, 2022)

    This court has previously found that evidence of prior drug sales is probative of the defendant's knowledge and intent to possess drugs for resale. See State v. Richard Wayne Hampton, No. W2006-02189-CCA-R3-CD, 2008 WL 169645, at *4 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Jan. 18, 2008), State v. Allen Jean Stephens, No. M2004-00531-CCA-R3-CD, 2005 WL 1541850, *4 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, June 23, 2005); State v. Roger M. Staples, No. M2003-01433-CCA-R3-CD, 2004 WL 1337265, *4 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Nashville, June 14, 2004); State v. Maurice Lashaun Nash, No. W2000-02971-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 1482731, *5 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, Feb. 8, 2002) (Tenn.2002); State v. Johnny Wayne Tillery, No. 01C01-9506-CC-00182, 1998 WL 148326, at *6 (Tenn. Crim. App., Nashville, Mar. 30, 1998); see also State v. Little, 854 S.W.2d 643, 649 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992).

  2. State v. Hampton

    No. W2006-02189-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 18, 2008)   Cited 4 times

    See State v. Allen Jean Stephens, No. M2004-00531-CCA-R3-CD, 2005 WL 1541850, *4 (Tenn.Crim.App., at Jackson, June 23, 2005), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 2005); State v. Roger M. Staples, No. M2003-01433-CCA-R3-CD, 2004 WL 1337265, *4 (Tenn.Crim.App., at Nashville, June 14, 2004); State v. Maurice Lashaun Nash, No. W2000-02971-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 WL 1482731, *5 (Tenn.Crim.App., at Jackson, Feb. 8, 2002), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 2002); State v. Johnny Wayne Tillery, No. 01C01-9506-CC-00182, 1998 WL 148326, at *6 (Tenn.Crim.App., Nashville, Mar. 30, 1998), perm. app. denied (Tenn.

  3. State v. Garrett

    No. M2001-00540-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 28, 2002)

    The affidavit stated Detective Norrod searched the informant for drugs before each purchase, listened to the transactions through electronic monitoring, and then took possession of the drugs from the informant immediately after each transaction. The facts of the instant case are somewhat similar to those in State v. Maurice Lashaun Nash, No. W2000-02971-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 112 (Tenn.Crim.App. Feb. 8, 2002, at Jackson). In Nash, an officer conducted surveillance of the defendant's residence and monitored drug purchases made through a police informant before obtaining a search warrant.