From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nakatani

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Nov 16, 2001
24546 (Haw. Nov. 16, 2001)

Opinion

24546

November 16, 2001.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 00-1-1962)

ORDER


Upon consideration of the petition for a writ directed to a judge filed by Petitioner State of Hawai`i and the papers in support, it appears that:

(1) the respondent judge entered an order granting Defendant-Respondent Maximo Cristobal, Jr.'s motion for a deferred acceptance of guilty (DAG) plea in State v. Cristobal, Cr. No. 00-1-1962;

(2) Petitioner contends Defendant-Respondent Cristobal was ineligible for a DAG plea because he had received a DAG plea in 1981;

(3) pursuant to HRS § 853-4(11), a defendant cannot be granted a DAG plea where the defendant has been charged with a felony offense and has been previously granted a DAG plea for a prior offense, regardless of whether the period of deferral has already expired; and

(4) Defendant-Respondent Cristobal acknowledges that he previously received a DAG plea and was not entitled to receive a DAG plea in the instant case. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the petition for a writ of mandamus is granted; (2) the order granting the deferred acceptance of guilty plea in State v. Cristobal, Cr. No.00-1-1962, is vacated; and (3) this matter is remanded to the circuit court for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Nakatani

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Nov 16, 2001
24546 (Haw. Nov. 16, 2001)
Case details for

State v. Nakatani

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI`I, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE GAIL C. NAKATANI, JUDGE OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Nov 16, 2001

Citations

24546 (Haw. Nov. 16, 2001)