From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Najarro

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Oct 24, 2024
No. A-1-CA-41310 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2024)

Opinion

A-1-CA-41310

10-24-2024

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORLONDO NAJARRO, Defendant-Appellant.

Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Felicity Strachan, Assistant Solicitor General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee. Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant.


Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Steven Blankinship, District Court Judge.

Raúl Torrez, Attorney General Felicity Strachan, Assistant Solicitor General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee.

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge.

{¶1} This matter was submitted to this Court on Defendant's brief in chief pursuant to the Administrative Order for Appeals in Criminal Cases from the Second, Eleventh, and Twelfth Judicial District Courts in In re Pilot Project for Criminal Appeals, No. 2022-002, effective November 1, 2022. Following consideration of the brief in chief, this Court assigned this matter to Track 2 for additional briefing. Now having considered the brief in chief, answer brief, and reply brief, we reverse in part and remand for resentencing.

{¶2} Defendant argues that his convictions for shooting at or from a motor vehicle, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-3-8(B) (1993), and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-3-5(C) (1969), constitute double jeopardy. [BIC 4; 2 RP 261-66] The State responded in its answer brief and agrees with Defendant's analysis, conceding that Defendant's convictions violate double jeopardy. [AB 1, 6-7] While this Court is not bound by such a concession, having reviewed the facts here and in accordance with State v. Montoya, 2013-NMSC-020, ¶¶ 28-54, 306 P.3d 426, and its progeny, we agree with the parties that these two convictions violate double jeopardy. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing with instructions to the district court to vacate Defendant's conviction for shooting at a motor vehicle, as the conviction carrying the shorter sentence. Id. ¶¶ 55-56. [BIC 14, AB 7]

{¶3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge, ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge.


Summaries of

State v. Najarro

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Oct 24, 2024
No. A-1-CA-41310 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Najarro

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ORLONDO NAJARRO…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Oct 24, 2024

Citations

No. A-1-CA-41310 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2024)