From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nabors

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 2011
706 S.E.2d 780 (N.C. 2011)

Summary

holding that "Officer Byrd's and Mr. Gendreau's conjecture based on their previous encounters with cocaine and their observation of the substance here was not the `scientifically valid chemical analysis' of the substance required `to establish the identity of the controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt'"

Summary of this case from State v. Rider

Opinion

No. 479PA10

7 April 2011


ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of November 2010 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of April 2011.


Summaries of

State v. Nabors

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 2011
706 S.E.2d 780 (N.C. 2011)

holding that "Officer Byrd's and Mr. Gendreau's conjecture based on their previous encounters with cocaine and their observation of the substance here was not the `scientifically valid chemical analysis' of the substance required `to establish the identity of the controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt'"

Summary of this case from State v. Rider
Case details for

State v. Nabors

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ELIJAH OMAR NABORS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

706 S.E.2d 780 (N.C. 2011)

Citing Cases

State v. Rider

upon a visual examination of the questioned medications and the fact that, in the absence of testimony…