From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. M.Z

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 3, 2007
150 P.3d 1069 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 0505-65522; A129028.

Submitted on record and briefs November 3, 2006.

January 3, 2007.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Lewis B. Lawrence, Judge.

Travis Eiva, Benjamin Haile, and The Law Offices of Haile Eiva, L.L.P., filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Carolyn Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Linder, Judge pro tempore.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that he is presently a danger to himself or others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. M.Z

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 3, 2007
150 P.3d 1069 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. M.Z

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of M. Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 3, 2007

Citations

150 P.3d 1069 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
150 P.3d 1069