From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mulwee

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 14, 1913
94 S.C. 323 (S.C. 1913)

Opinion

8521

April 14, 1913.

Before MEMMINGER, J., Oconee, March term, 1912. Affirmed.

Indictment against Ernest Mulwee for murder of Sam Hyde. Defendant appeals.

Mr. R.T. Jaynes, for appellant, cites: Law changing kind and place of punishment after crime is an ex post facto law: S. Cyc. 1030; 28 P. 816.

Solicitor Proctor A. Bonham, contra.


April 14, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


Defendant appealed from sentence of death by electrocution, upon conviction of murder. The first ground taken is ruled by Malloy's case, 95 S.C. The only other ground is that the Court erred in explaining to the jury the difference between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. The defendant having been convicted of murder, the error was immaterial.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Mulwee

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 14, 1913
94 S.C. 323 (S.C. 1913)
Case details for

State v. Mulwee

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. MULWEE

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 14, 1913

Citations

94 S.C. 323 (S.C. 1913)
77 S.E. 1027

Citing Cases

Wood v. Hutchinson Coal Co.

No man could know when he was freed from its obligations, and a liability would be imposed not contained in…

State v. Patrick

SeeState v. Gandy, 283 S.C. 571, 324 S.E.2d 65 (1984). As this Court held in State v. Mulwee, 94 S.C. 323, 77…