Although a trial court's failure to make appropriate findings justifying consecutive sentences may be remedied on direct appeal, the failure does not render the consecutive sentences illegal. Indeed, we have specifically held that "a failure to make required findings in support of consecutive sentencing is not a fatal error that would render the sentences illegal and entitle the [Defendant] to either habeas corpus or Rule 36.1 relief." State v. Moses, No. W2019-01219-CCA-R3-CD, 2020 WL 4187317, at *4 (Tenn. Crim. App. July 20, 2020), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Dec.
A post-judgment petition in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus was also denied, and the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Criminal Appeals. See State v. Moses, No. W2019-01219-CCA-R3-CD, 2020 WL 4187317, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. July 20, 2020), perm. app. denied (Dec. 4, 2020). As such, her guilty plea was not withdrawn.