From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jun 27, 1995
900 S.W.2d 281 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 63216, 66961.

June 27, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY; KENNETH W. PRATTE, JUDGE.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of two counts of sodomy and one count of rape and his sentence as a prior offender to consecutive fifteen year prison terms for each count. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without evidentiary hearing. No error of law appears, the verdict is supported by the evidence, and the issues raised by the defendant are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment on the rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgments on direct appeal and on Rule 29.15 appeal are affirmed. Rules 30.25 (b), 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jun 27, 1995
900 S.W.2d 281 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE MORGAN, APPELLANT. GEORGE MORGAN…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Jun 27, 1995

Citations

900 S.W.2d 281 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Morgan v. State

On July 21, 1994, the motion court entered its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, denying…