From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two
Jun 24, 1983
654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 12752.

June 24, 1983.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, HAROLD A. KYSER, J.

John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Smarr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Dan K. Purdy, Osceola, for defendant-appellant.


Appellant attempts to appeal from an order revoking his probation and imposing a sentence of five years' imprisonment for felony possession of marijuana. In his brief he attacks alleged errors in the probation revocation proceedings.

There is no appeal from a revocation of probation except perhaps when the sufficiency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court is challenged. Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App. 1983). See also State v. Murphy, 626 S.W.2d 649 (Mo. App. 1981). Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the information or the jurisdiction of the trial court.

The appeal is dismissed.

MAUS, P.J., and HOGAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two
Jun 24, 1983
654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEVIN CLARENCE MORGAN…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two

Date published: Jun 24, 1983

Citations

654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. Burnett

It is true that a direct appeal from a probation revocation is cognizable when subject matter jurisdiction is…

State v. Vansickle

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the charge against him nor the jurisdiction of the trial…