From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Morgan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 1982
60 Or. App. 491 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 45586 (Control) and 45615, CA A24297 (Control) and A24298

Argued and submitted November 12, 1982.

Affirmed as modified December 1, 1982.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lincoln County, A. R. McMullen, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, and Marilyn C. McManus, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Richard W. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, and Alta J. Brady, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Judgment of conviction amended to require, as a condition of probation, that defendant make restitution to Henry Knutson in the sum of $124 and to Robert Pacheco in the sum of $472. Affirmed as modified.


Defendant was charged and convicted of the theft of crab pots belonging to two other persons. In imposing sentence, the trial court required restitution, inter alia, for six crab pots whose loss is not shown on this record to be connected with defendant's criminal activity. The state concedes that the restitution ordered in favor of each of the two parties should be reduced by $300. Exercising our authority under Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3, we amend the judgment accordingly.

Judgment of conviction amended to require, as a condition of probation, that defendant, make restitution to Henry Knutson in the sum of $124 and to Robert Pacheco in the sum of $472. Affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Morgan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 1982
60 Or. App. 491 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRED EUGENE MORGAN, II, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 1, 1982

Citations

60 Or. App. 491 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
653 P.2d 1318