Opinion
1 CA-CR 22-0262 PRPC
12-13-2022
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JORGE MORENO, Petitioner.
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent Jorge Moreno, Florence Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Nos. CR1999-011811 CR1996-013572 CR1999-009096 The Honorable Jennifer E. Green, Judge
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent
Jorge Moreno, Florence Petitioner 1
Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma, Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, and Vice Chief Judge David B. Gass delivered the following decision.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
¶1 Petitioner Jorge Moreno seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Moreno's sixth petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for postconviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011).
¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order denying the petition for post-conviction relief and the petition for review. This court finds the petitioner has not established error.
¶4 This court grants review but denies relief. 2