Summary
In Morales, we applied the objective entrapment standard enounced in Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985), and held that Morales had been entrapped as a matter of law.
Summary of this case from Morales v. StateOpinion
No. 79533.
November 10, 1993. Rehearing Denied February 8, 1994.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal, Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District, Case No. 91-00232 (Hillsborough County).
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
No appearance, for respondent.
We grant the petition for review of Morales v. State, 594 So.2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), but dispense with the filing of briefs on the merits and oral argument. We quash Morales and remand for reconsideration in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993).
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.