From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Moral

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 5, 2016
366 P.3d 664 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

finding the district court properly accepted a factual basis for the plea, even though it was inconsistent with the crime charged

Summary of this case from State v. Pollman

Opinion

No. 111,426.

02-05-2016

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Carlos MORAL, Appellant.

Michael P. Whalen, of Law Office of Michael P. Whalen, of Wichita, for appellant. Amanda G. Voth, assistant solicitor general, of Office of Kansas Attorney General, for appellee.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.


Summaries of

State v. Moral

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Feb 5, 2016
366 P.3d 664 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

finding the district court properly accepted a factual basis for the plea, even though it was inconsistent with the crime charged

Summary of this case from State v. Pollman
Case details for

State v. Moral

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Carlos MORAL, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

366 P.3d 664 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Pollman

Flores , 292 Kan. at 260-61, 252 P.3d 570. We recently applied McPherson in State v. Moral , No. 111,426,…