Opinion
1 CA-CR 22-0401 PRPC
04-20-2023
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. CHEYENNE DEAN MOORE, Petitioner.
Mohave County Attorney's Office, Kingman By Jacob Cote Counsel for Respondent Cheyenne Dean Moore, Florence Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County No. S8015CR201800830 The Honorable Douglas Camacho, Judge Pro Tempore
Mohave County Attorney's Office, Kingman By Jacob Cote Counsel for Respondent
Cheyenne Dean Moore, Florence Petitioner
Vice Chief Judge David B. Gass, Judge Brian Y. Furuya, and Judge Andrew M. Jacobs delivered the decision of the court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM
¶1 Petitioner Cheyenne Dean Moore seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner's seventh petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for review, and the response. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.