From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mooney

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 2, 2020
2020 N.D. 127 (N.D. 2020)

Opinion

No. 20190333

06-02-2020

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Archie Allen MOONEY, Defendant and Appellant

Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.


Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Archie Mooney appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of multiple drug related offenses. Mooney argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle

Jerod E. Tufte

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jon J. Jensen, C.J.


Summaries of

State v. Mooney

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 2, 2020
2020 N.D. 127 (N.D. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Mooney

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Archie Allen Mooney…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Jun 2, 2020

Citations

2020 N.D. 127 (N.D. 2020)
943 N.W.2d 483