As the Commissioner noted in her Report and Recommendation, the renewal of these motions would not have been effective because the Superior Court, and later this Court, held that the attempted robbery testimony from Jonathan and Ronald was properly admitted. State v. Monroe, 2014 WL 934446, at *6-7 (Del. Super. Mar. 6, 2014). As for the motion to sever, we held, in ruling on Monroe's direct appeal, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Monroe's motion to sever the January 2006 attempted murder charge and the April 2007 first degree murder charge.
The Commissioner's Report and Recommendation set forth the procedural history of this case:State v. Monroe, 2014 WL 934446, at *1 (Del. Super. Mar. 6, 2014). For a complete narrative of the factual circumstances of this case unrelated to this appeal see Monroe, 28 A.3d at 423-25.