From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mitchum

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 19, 2018
2018-UP-469 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-469

12-19-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-000225

Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2018

Appeal From Orangeburg County James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mitchum

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 19, 2018
2018-UP-469 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Mitchum

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-469 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)