From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mitchum

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 19, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2018-000225 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000225 Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-469

12-19-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant.

Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Orangeburg County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defenders Robert M. Pachak and LaNelle Cantey DuRant, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mitchum

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 19, 2018
Appellate Case No. 2018-000225 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Mitchum

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Will Rogers Mitchum, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2018-000225 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2018)