Opinion
No. 32,258.
January 26, 1940.
Disorderly conduct — indecent exposure — conviction sustained.
The conviction of disorderly conduct is sustained by the evidence.
Defendant appealed from a judgment of conviction of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Hennepin county, Paul W. Guilford, Judge, in a prosecution for disorderly conduct. Affirmed.
Sam J. Levy, for appellant.
J.A.A. Burnquist, Attorney General, M. Tedd Evans, Assistant Attorney General, R.S. Wiggin, City Attorney, and J.A. Hadley, Assistant City Attorney, for the State.
Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.