From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 26, 2019
2019-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-228

06-26-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Demon Mitchell, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-002474

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Maurice Demon Mitchell, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted June 1, 2019

Appeal From Hampton County Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Maurice Demon Mitchell, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 26, 2019
2019-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 26, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Demon Mitchell, Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-228 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 26, 2019)