State v. Mitchell

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Demon Mitchell, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Appellate Case No. 2017-002474 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-002474 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-228

06-26-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Demon Mitchell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Maurice Demon Mitchell, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Hampton County
Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Maurice Demon Mitchell, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.