From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Miranda

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Feb 26, 2020
SCWC-17-0000660 (Haw. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

SCWC-17-0000660

02-26-2020

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALEXANDER MIRANDA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-17-0000660; CR. NO. 16-1-0315) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant's application for writ of certiorari, filed on January 13, 2020, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. Oral argument will be restricted to the following questions presented in the application for certiorari:

2) Did the Intermediate Court of Appeals Gravely Err in Ruling That the Circuit Court Did Not Err in Precluding Trial Counsel From Cross-Examining the Complainant Based on the Marine Corps Code of Conduct?

3) Did the Intermediate Court of Appeals Gravely Err in Ruling That [] the Circuit Court Did Not Err in Finding That Defense Counsel Opened the Door to Officer Gazelle's Testimony Regarding the Videotape?

5) Did the Intermediate Court of Appeals Gravely Err in Ruling That the Jury Was Properly Instructed on Accomplice Liability?

The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 26, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

State v. Miranda

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Feb 26, 2020
SCWC-17-0000660 (Haw. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALEXANDER MIRANDA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

SCWC-17-0000660 (Haw. Feb. 26, 2020)