From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1927
139 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 5 October, 1927.)

APPEAL by defendants from Sinclair, J., at March Term, 1927, of ONSLOW. Indictment for larceny of a motor car.

Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.

Summersill Summersill for defendants.


The defendants excepted to the verdict and judgment. The verdict was warranted by the evidence and the judgment is in due form.

No error.


Summaries of

State v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1927
139 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

State v. Mintz

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. DAVID MINTZ AND HERBERT ANDREWS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1927

Citations

139 S.E. 927 (N.C. 1927)
194 N.C. 794